"Each time, less freedom? Machismo
Remember the definition of the dialogue of Socrates , and as through it were achievable new ideas and concepts, using the dialectic? So when I talk with certain people, I get the feeling that that happens, and that after the debate I a mijitilla smarter, in addition to having new opinions. I love these people as Socratic. And I have the fortune to share and share 50% of my DNA with a person with the most is given this type of conversation is my mother.
When it was announced on television the implementation of the smoking ban , I waited for his reaction immediately. The phrase that I scored very positively released:
- now make laws, which if approved in my time we had thrown us hands to the head. There is less freedom than at the beginning of democracy.
So I showed that people who lived part of his childhood and youth in the Franco regime, is, in substance, most hard and with a sense of rebellion my generation accommodative and consumer, has been lost.
Regarding the smoking ban (Only remarcaré my opinion about the news , because the old law was not so restrictive): I agree with that not smoke in parks, hospitals, schools .. . What grates me are around (for example, if teachers who smoke, before leaving the site is to make it to the street now, where do they go?) And the fact that owners bars and restaurants make them put facilities for now miss the entire investment (Why was not banned completely from scratch?).
Nor
I think it appropriate to demonize the figure of the smoker : If you want to, while others do not have to breathe your smoke, go ahead.
But my parent's phrase not only helped me to this subject. Can be applied to this blog and decaffeinated freedoms (such as downloading Internet files, or freedom of expression).
Without going any further, this blog and have tried to lay hands two persons, of whom I personally know one. One of these subjects (staunch Christian) wanted to shut the blog to talk about sex . As obviously not going to do, and had published an article on Crochet Melilla, told the company that owns the or remove the post or denouncing your account Tuenti (The business, not your personal account). I had to delete the post, and months after the account was also closed Tuenti.
The second wanted remove a picture of the many that exist, about a fictional character , only because he had it as an avatar in a social network and did not want to associate it (What a bullshit, mostly because legally, the image does not belong!). In this case shut me in band, and is still the hung cartoon . "The best part? did not even have the courage to tell me in the face , but I learned from a colleague of mine to hit him, poor, request removal of the photo.
short, there is some fear of this blog, and do not understand why. It reminds me of a program that had Risto Mejide , which was dedicated to putting greens to be expected, the 20 worst public figures this week. I think many would prefer to leave that program (If re-issued), before they appear on this blog.
0 comments:
Post a Comment