will be very unlikely to forget that reflection that we became professor of Genetics last year because I'm still spinning. More or less came to say this: Why Why, if we let men do what they want, women end up enslaved and trampled, and if we try to achieve equality, men are aggressive and are not happy?
On countless occasions, scientific discoveries in the field of biology, especially with regard to the Genetics and Molecular Biology, used in bad faith to build fallacious arguments. An example would justify the fact that a man rapes a woman by the fact that testosterone is associated with sexual libido. Or rather, cross to a woman of "unfeminine" by having a strong desire to lust, to be the predominant estrogen in us (Although, eye, estrogen also increases the libido).
Medical Students made it clear to us the thing: Yes, our behavior has an important genetic background, metabolic and molecular , but this is not conclusive in any case. In short, much as human beings can decipher, moral duty and responsibility for our actions as still in force as when we were naives in the wisdom of our own body.
The macho argue as follows: If the animal kingdom (governed purely by biological laws) males try to reproduce at all costs, is allowed any aberration of a man towards a woman. However this, being able to become pregnant only once every 9 months, you should be on ALL the responsibility that falls sex.
Poor fools! Humanity If Darwinists continue maximum, most of these loudmouths would be dead! , then there would be no healing that supply the genetic defects that have inherited . Thus, those who were not born with a good immune system or some metabolic deficiency, succumb to disease, leaving no descendants . If you take her to the end their arguments, less than half of men come to have children, barely reach to touch a woman . But of course, biology is used here for what interests them they are invent some way of keeping women in bondage male .
On countless occasions, scientific discoveries in the field of biology, especially with regard to the Genetics and Molecular Biology, used in bad faith to build fallacious arguments. An example would justify the fact that a man rapes a woman by the fact that testosterone is associated with sexual libido. Or rather, cross to a woman of "unfeminine" by having a strong desire to lust, to be the predominant estrogen in us (Although, eye, estrogen also increases the libido).
Medical Students made it clear to us the thing: Yes, our behavior has an important genetic background, metabolic and molecular , but this is not conclusive in any case. In short, much as human beings can decipher, moral duty and responsibility for our actions as still in force as when we were naives in the wisdom of our own body.
The macho argue as follows: If the animal kingdom (governed purely by biological laws) males try to reproduce at all costs, is allowed any aberration of a man towards a woman. However this, being able to become pregnant only once every 9 months, you should be on ALL the responsibility that falls sex.
Poor fools! Humanity If Darwinists continue maximum, most of these loudmouths would be dead! , then there would be no healing that supply the genetic defects that have inherited . Thus, those who were not born with a good immune system or some metabolic deficiency, succumb to disease, leaving no descendants . If you take her to the end their arguments, less than half of men come to have children, barely reach to touch a woman . But of course, biology is used here for what interests them they are invent some way of keeping women in bondage male .
0 comments:
Post a Comment